Pro-Choice

At one time not too far in the distant past, Pro-Choice was the mantra chosen by those who wanted to have abortions legal in the United Sates.   Abortion was then deemed legal as a result of the Roe v. Wade decision by the U.S. Supreme Court which ruled that a woman (with her doctor), could choose abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without legal restriction, and with restrictions in later months, based on the right to privacy (January 22, 1973).  However, having won the abortion battle was obviously not enough to satisfy the Pro-Choice assemblage because their new catch-phrase is "Women's Right to Health Care" and their argument is that the government is obligated to pay for abortions else the alleged constitutional right to women's health is threatened. 

Note: "Women's Right to Health Care" is a pseudonym for taxpayer funded abortions.

Now, I'm not sure which constitution the Pro-Choicers' are referring to but I've read the U.S. Constitution many times and I did not see where any reference to taxpayer funding is mentioned on this matter.  Of course I am not a constitutional scholar so perhaps I am missing something, somewhere, somehow!  What's really at the motivation of this issue is a recent House of Representative proposal to stop taxpayer funding of abortion clinics thereby leaving clinics such as Planned Parenthood, Inc., to financially fend for themselves instead of profiting off of the public dole.  Additionally, according to The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a growing number of states are stopping Planned Parenthood from receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds.  So, the multi-billion dollar question is - does one's constitutional right to do something obligate the taxpayers to finance the exercise of that right?  I say NOT!

Let's see how this might work given the liberal mindset.  I have a constitutional right to "free speech" but should I expect the people of this great nation to pay for my higher-level education so I can learn to be more eloquent in my speech.  Hey, my English are good!  I also have a constitutional right to own and bear arms but I'm not sending the bill for my guns to Uncle Sam either.  Maybe I'm missing out on something here.  You get the point, I'm sure.

However let me make this perfectly clear (Obama's favorite phrase when he does not want clarity), regarding Pro-Choice, that is a woman's right to choose, I support that 100%.  Yes, I am a Christian Conservative and I fully agree that a woman has a right to choose!  BUT (you knew there had to be a disclaimer coming, right), BUT I firmly believe that a woman's right to choose ends at conception because then the choice on life (or not) must be transferred to the newly created life living in the womb.

Prior to conception I believe that a woman has the choice, or not, to engage in an activity that may result in a new life being created because, with the exception of rape, every woman has the ultimate control over her body.  I believe then that a woman has the choice to use birth control, or not, knowing that such prevention methods are not a guarantee that conception will not occur.  I also believe that only God has the right to decide whether or not the child will live through the pregnancy.

It's called individual responsibility. If I make a decision that leads to unwanted consequences then I should bear that responsibility and not expect my neighbors to assume that responsibility on my behalf.  An analogy to this is if I choose to drive my car in a reckless manner that may lead to a moving violation, or worse, an accident, then who is at fault and who is financially responsible to amend that fault (rhetorical question)?  Can I claim that my rights to drive my car are being violated because the government is not paying for the costs associated with my actions?  Why should I be cited for choosing to drive recklessly?  Should I sue the automobile manufacturer for not designing a safety mechanism that would have prevented me from speeding?  Perhaps the DMV is at fault for issuing me a driver's license!  Going to court and paying fines is just too inconvenient for me at this time.  I'm just not ready for all of this responsibility.  None of this is my fault - right?

Why would unwanted pregnancies be any different? 

Again let me make this perfectly clear, it's called individual responsibility which is not a constitutional right but it is the right and responsibility to choose what is morally right.

"The eyes of the Lord watch over those who do right, and his ears are open to their prayers.  But the Lord turns his face against those who do evil." 
(1 Peter3:12)

Godless

Is the United States of America still the same nation of Godly people once founded and governed by Judeo-Christian beliefs and principles?  Well, the answer to that may be a resounding "no" according to the 2012 Democratic party.  I say this because the 2012 Democratic National Convention (DNC) has now removed all references to God from their 2012 platform - God is not mentioned even one time in their officially published 2012 platform document.

Yet ...

In the run-up to the Democratic National Convention, several hundred Muslims attended "Islamic Jumah," or Friday prayer, in a park in Charlotte, N.C., as part of an effort to mobilize Muslims and get them engaged in political discourse.  Originally Obama’s DNC listed this assembly as an "official function", but the Democrats removed this event from their official agenda for appearance sake after receiving backlash from across the country.  Prior to this, the Obama Campaign denied Catholic Cardinal Timothy Dolan's request to lead prayer at the convention.

Then, in start contrast to their 2008 platform, the Democratic Party failed to affirm Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.  According to NewsMax, In 2008, the Democratic platform included the words “Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel,” saying “It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths,” but the city does not even rate a mention this time around. The platform merely says that the Democrats have “an unshakable commitment to Israel’s security” and will do everything it can to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.

Next, the DNC platform officially recognizes same-sex marriages and calls for the removal of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a federal law that denies federal recognition of same-sex marriages and authorizes states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states.

Lastly, the DNC platform officially supports pro-choice (abortion) by keeping the Roe vs. Wade ruling on abortion rights. The platform states: “Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a woman, her family, her doctor and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or government to get in the way;”

So in summary, the Democratic Party no longer recognizes God but does support worship to Allah and endorses same-sex marriages and abortions on demand.  Not exactly what one would expect from what is supposed to be representative of a God-fearing country!

Now, none of the above revelations surprise me but it definitely does scare me.  The Democratic Party has been marching down this road for some time but since the election of Barrack Hussein Obama the push away from Christianity and towards Islam has been unprecedented and unchecked.

However, there is one aspect of this that still has me baffled though which is:  A large percentage of the Democratic Party is comprised of individuals that identify themselves as Christians, that is, followers of Jesus Christ.  For them specifically I have two questions:

If you are a follower of Christ then why do you support an entity that denies God and endorses anti-Christian principles?  Or are you just a Christian by name and not by any other standard or individual action?  That is for you to judge, not me!

It is said that “Integrity is doing the right thing, even if nobody is watching.”  This is especially true for Christians as they try to live a life of faith emulating that of Christ Jesus.  One such opportunity is when we are alone in a voting booth where we are confronted with a choice to follow God or to follow man.  Would your expected vote reflect Biblical principles or will it reflect worldly opinion?  Again that is for you to judge but remember that although no one else is in that voting booth with you, you are not alone, and that your choices should reflect your relationship with Jesus Christ.  Will they?

When once the master of the house has risen and shuts the door, and you begin to stand outside and to knock at the door, saying, 'Lord, open to us,' then he will answer you, 'I do not know where you come from.' Then you will begin to say, 'We ate and drank in your presence, and you taught in our streets.' But he will say, 'I tell you, I do not know where you come from. Depart from me, all you workers of evil!'  In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God but you yourselves cast out.  (Luke 13: 25-28)

PS:  Since the release of this post, I was questioned whether or not I believe that one can be a Christian and be a Democrat at the same time.  My immediate response was - that's not for me to decide, but from purely an observational perspective, given what was stated above about the Democratic Party, there is a major conflict concerning the ambitions and focus between Christianity and that of the Democratic Party.  Remember "No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other."  (Matt 6:24). 

Let's for a moment replace the Democratic Party from of this conversation with the word "church" and then ask the same question:  "Should a Christian belong to a church that no longer recognizes God but does support worship to some other god and also endorses same-sex marriages and abortions on demand?"  The answer now becomes rhetorical but because politics has become a religion in of itself some have difficulty arriving at the same conclusion.

I'll close the conversation with this:

"But, dear friends, remember what the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ foretold.   They said to you, "In the last times there will be scoffers who will follow their own ungodly desires."  These are the men who divide you, who follow mere natural instincts and do not have the Spirit.  But you, dear friends, build yourselves up in your most holy faith and pray in the Holy Spirit.  Keep yourselves in God's love as you wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to bring you to eternal life.  Be merciful to those who doubt;  snatch others from the fire and save them; to others show mercy, mixed with fear--hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh.  To him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before His glorious presence without fault and with great joy-- to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen."  (Jude 1:17-25)

 

God's Gift

 

 

 

 

Jordan Patrick Mitchell

 

Revealed to the World on August 19, 2012

at 31 weeks

2 lbs 10 oz

 







What If

.

What if...

...there were no more...

...what if's?

.

My Story

I feared God and I was plagued by guilt.  It seemed that I could never do enough, or the right things, to please God.  I was driven to achieve perfection in everything.  There were so many rules, conditions, and other unattainable criteria I thought that God demanded before He would love me. 


When I met the real Christ Jesus, I discovered the truth about God's loving forgiveness through the scriptures and through my new relationship with His Son.


Now I live free of guilt and confident of who I am.  But of greatest importance, I know who God is and I know that He loves me even though I am still a sinner.

"And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."  (John 8:32)

.

Follow The Leader

Driving to work one day I found myself behind a plain old white truck.  Nothing significant about this truck, no signs or markings to indicate that this truck was employed by any business or public enterprise.  I mention this because on this truck's rear tailgate was a bumper sticker which read "You Are Following The Leader".  I was immediately put-off by the implication of the bumper sticker's message which seemed to imply that just because this vehicle was in front of me that it, therefore, appointed itself as my leader, ergo, I was its follower.  The audacity of this to think that just because of some ironic happenstance, perhaps by the "Traffic Gods", that because of a purely random physical alignment of vehicular movement, I was now designated as a follower to some self-designated leader.

For the record, I thought, just because someone is in front of me does not make that one a leader no more than does my location behind make me a follower.  Physical positioning does not automatically equate to a position of leadership or of subservience.  As it happens through normal flow of traffic I soon found myself abeam to this plain old white truck in the other lane.  I asked myself, are we now in a peer-to-peer relationship?  And as I pulled ahead of this truck did I suddenly become the new leader of a pack of two?

Just because people (vehicles in this instance) are moving in the same direction at any point in time does not mean that they are headed to the same objective or motivated through a bonding sense of unity.  Physical hierarchy, whether appointed or arbitrarily arranged, does not necessarily correlate to a leader/follower relationship.  True leaders do not get the luxury to appoint their followers, however, it is the followers that determine whom their leaders will be!

In  retrospect, do not these same leader/follower principles apply on the roads through life in our personal and professional relationships?  Let's examine various "assigned" positions of authority / leadership, such as the President of our country, or as the Pope of the Catholic Church, or as a school principal, or even as a parent.   Even though all of these positions are deemed ones of leadership by society, the place-holders throughout time do not always gain the respect as leaders from their respective followers - to say the least.  Think about this: Does any President of the United States garner the respect from all of the citizens - not!  Do all Catholics follow the dictum extolled by the Pope - not!  If all school principals were true leaders would we expect to experience the ever-increasing amount of strife, resistance and behavior problems from the student body - not!  And do all offspring actually follow in the footsteps of their parents - not!  My point, again, is that one in a leadership position does not necessarily make that one a leader no more than does a plain old white truck in front of you make you a follower of it.

Leadership is earned, not decreed, not appointed, not elected, not inherited, and certainly not self-imposed.  There are huge philosophical differences between being a "boss" versus being a "leader". 

How about yourself?  Where do you or I fit in?  Are we leading anyone, intentionally or otherwise?  As Christians we are challenged first to lead by example, to live our lives that reflects the love, mercy and grace exhibited by Jesus Christ.  How do we measure-up to Jesus' standards of leadership?  

Also as Christians we must first learn to follow before we can expect to become effective leaders.  At least we have a leader to which we can try to emulate; One that has has shown us the way, the truth, and the life!  And totally contrary to the world's standards whereby one measurement of success is determined by how many followers one has amassed, under God's Kingdom our success is measured by how we lead others to become followers of Christ Jesus.

So, when you find yourself on your daily commute along life's many roads, look in front of you to see who really it is you are following.  Next look in the rear-view mirror to see if anyone is actually following you.  And if you are following or if you have followers, do you know where you are headed?

Remember, if you are not leading or if you are not following then perhaps you are just driving a plain old white truck lost on the road to salvation. 



.          
         

Sew Their!

How often are we confronted with the improper application of the words there, their or they’re? In my opinion, more often than what should be accepted as an occasional typing error. Too me it has become quite obvious that to many people do not know there theirs from they’re there’s. Perhaps one can point the blame on our educational system, their certainly is enough they’re too blame, but when the “typo” is from an adults to, perhaps the problem is beyond intelligence and harbors on lackadaisical indifference!

Another thought looks at the current phenomena of “texting” whereby the spelling of words are shortened on purpose "two xpidite the typin of wrds 2 save thumb-time." The real challenge to texting is knowing when too use text-talk and when knot to. Imagine when a young school graduate applies four a job interview and throughout the resume is text-talk. Yes, I’ll hire you rite now!

Technology applications in the world of digital error correction software impose additional challenges when one relys upon “spell-check” or even the more dangerous “auto-correction” in place of manuel proof-reading. Both of these applications are great tools but to totally relay upon there finished product without one’s personal editorial review before publishing is really putting your intellectual credibility open four scrutiny. Most grammer-checking applications are also unreliable and should therefore be used only as a secondary means too edit one’s righting!

Now please do not interpret my observations hear and label me as a “no-it-all” because I to have printed my share of English foupahs! Know one is perfect butt should we knot strive towards perfection by carefully examining our publications before hitting the “send button” in hour e-mails and other on-line or written correspondences? Its just really an eye-opener when I read papers from pubic schools that have been graded with an “A” yet have obvious errors as were discussing hear and it appears that neither the teacher nor the student our concerned.

Well, you may shruff this off and pretend that all of this is know big deal, but four me I will continue with my endeavor to not only be correct in what I due but also to correct others as I deem necessary - so they‘re, oops, their, I mean, there!




.

New Year Happiness

Once again we are confronted with a new year!  We ceremoniously say goodbye to one year and anticipate what this new year will bring.  It is hoped by most that our opportunities for a happy coexistence in this life improve with the passing of the old year when in reality only one day has passed, not a year of days.  Our desires for a happier year is verbally reflected in our ritual of wishing everyone a "Happy New Year"!

But what is it exactly that we are wishing for?

Many years ago I challenged a few colleagues to complete the following statement: "I Will Be Happy When....".  The responses were as varied as were the individuals and as you may have expected, each person identified an event or situation of future occurrence at which its fruition would make them happy.  As I recall, five of the responses were: "To set goals and to reach them"; "When my teenage son leaves home"; "When the world becomes a safe place"; "When I find a job that makes me happy"; and "When life comes with a handbook"

If the same topic were posed to you, how would you have responded?  For a moment, reflect upon your first thought when pondering "I will be happy when...?

Perhaps you would have responded with "I will be happy when I get that raise" or maybe "a new job" or "when you retire".  For others happiness may be "when one gets engaged or married".  How about "When one has children or when the children have grown and moved out"- you know, the Empty Nest Syndrome!  Maybe inheriting a huge sum of money or even when your car or house is finally paid off, or when you become debt free.  Then again, perhaps you'll be happy when you finally lose that extra weight that you have been carrying around for a few decades or maybe when you gain some weight, get a new wardrobe, and on and on, the beat goes on!

Did you arrive with any of those scenarios or did you have something more original.  What was your answer?  When will you finally be happy? 

Did you notice the one common theme to all of the first five responses?  Given every circumstance, the criteria for being happy was fully dependent upon a future occurrence.  Not one person operated under the premise of one already being happy!  Could it have been that none of them were happy then?  I think not.  When you were posed with the same question, did you consider the prospect that you are already at that "happy state" and not anticipating some future expectation to be happy?  Was this question a trap or perhaps were the answers (yours included) a reflection of one's individual mindset?

Friends, we must learn to enjoy the journey because we may never reach that destination!  Happiness should be in the "now" and not in some obscure futuristic promise.  Remember that our next breath is not promised us but each is a gift from God.  The truth is that there is no better time to be happy than right now!

How many times in the past did we indicate that we would be happy if or when a certain condition was met.  How many New Year's resolutions have we forsaken?  Is not our current station in life the result of meeting or exceeding obstacles that were placed before us in the past?  Perhaps for many of those earlier conditions we may have stated that we would be happy when....!  Are you not happy now?  Is this discussion making you sad (ha)!

Maybe we are confused with the premise of what constitutes happiness.  Are we risking our happiness based upon a temporary circumstance?  Are you as happy now as you want to be, or can be?  I surmise that we should all be happy now else we would not be where we are with our lives.  Are we living the dream or dreaming to live?

So, where am I going with this?  Try this: If your life were to end right now, this very moment, would you leave us with a smile or with a frown on your face?  If you answered that you would be wearing an eternal smile then I contend that you understand what true happiness is and that you have arrived!  Otherwise, if not a smile you wore then you left us before you discovered how to achieve eternal happiness.

Eternal happiness - WOW - there is a concept to grasp.  Actually, eternal happiness is not a concept but a reality and many people achieve it right here on earth rather than waiting until they depart this world.  You see, waiting to achieve happiness until you leave this world is once again, as before, waiting for some future event or occurrence to happen.

What is as interesting to me is that one can tell who lives now with this eternal happiness simply by observing those around them.  Their secret to this happiness is that they have based their worldly happiness on non-worldly goals.  In other words, their happiness is measured by what they already have which, in turn, guarantees them happiness in the future.  In possession of this guaranteed happiness, who wouldn't walk around with a perpetual smile on a person that emanates peace, confidence and satisfaction.  Life, for them, is great as always!

Judge nothing, you will be happy. Forgive everything, you will be happier. Love everything, you will be happiest. - Sri Chinmoy

Maybe what is being suggested here is a change in attitude.  We should recognize and cherish the blessings that we have today because tomorrow may never be.

With this in mind, let's go back to those original five responses and review them in the present context.  The "Goal Maker" has already accomplished many goals in the past so what will more goals get that he/she doesn't already have;  The parent of the teenager will not rejoice but rather will lament the loss of her child;  If one fears the outside world then start by looking to your inner-world for love and security; While a job can provide financial security remember the age-old adage - one cannot buy happiness; and finally, for the one waiting for the handbook on life to he written - go write it yourself because you are living it!

If we want to know what happiness is we must seek it, not as if it were a part of gold at the end of the rainbow, but among human beings who are living richly and fully the good life. If you observe a really happy man you will find him building a boat, writing a symphony, educating his son, growing double Dahlias in his garden. He will not be searching for happiness as if it were a collar gold button that has rolled under the cupboard in his bed room. He will have become aware that he is happy in the course of living 24 crowded hours of the day.  W. Beran Wolfe

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

.

The December 25th Federal Holiday

Following the annual Thanksgiving holiday, nothing is more certain than the annual atheistic verbal onslaught along with the filing of lawsuits ritual against Christmas Nativity scenes and against the seasonal greetings of "Merry Christmas".  These people have replaced "freedom of religion" with "freedom from religion" and they misguidedly refer to the Separation Clause as authority for their cause.  Obviously Christmas is only one of many Christian symbols and traditions the atheists aim to have permanently removed from the American vernacular and landscape, but Christmas certainly is the most visible and highly contested target on their agenda.  In defense of this war on Christ, we Christians jump through hoops and spew the usual gamut of expected responses in an attempt to minimize losses and hold onto whatever vestiges of sacred grounds we perceive are left to protect.

Central to the atheists' argument is their assertion that Christmas is a Christian expression of faith, therefore they deduct that the observance or celebration of Christmas by governmental entities is in direct violation of the US Constitution's "Separation of Church and State" clause (oh yeah, it's not in the US Constitution but let's not confuse the facts with the issues).  Anything that is related to or implicates God is on their anti-religion hit list which is quite ironic because... 

God is not a religion; God is a reality!

What is as interesting to me is that I have not heard (but it may be out there in cyber-space) the counter-proposition that Christmas is not a Christian holiday!  Yes, no typo here - Christmas is not a Christian holiday - or perhaps maybe it should not be considered as a holiday just for Christians. 
                        
OK, you ask, if Christmas is not a Christian holiday then what are the alternatives?


Perhaps the answer to that question lies within the Bible.  Let's consider the following circumstances!

"Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel" (which means, God with us). (Matthew 1:23)

Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. (Matthew 1:18)

The birth of Jesus marks the first Christmas, and God's "gift" to Humanity, His One Begotten Son, was the first ever Christmas present.  Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born to Joseph & Mary - both of which were Jewish descendants with a lineage tracing back back to Abraham.  Now, if we just stop here this would then make Christmas a Jewish celebration and not a Christian religious observance.


Next, remember that the first usage of the term "Christian" came after Jesus' death, burial, resurrection and ascension into Heaven.  The first followers of Christ were initially referenced under the name "The Way" and were often referred to as "Christians".  Again, if we just stop here then this would still make Christmas a Jewish celebration and not a Christian religious observance.


However, even though Jesus was born a Jew, He was born a Saviour to all of mankind to deliver us to God's salvation.  God's second gift to world was subtly presented to us through Jesus' life as He demonstrated how to live a life in complete response to God's Will.  Thirty-three years after Jesus' birth, God's next gift to mankind was when He, who was without sin became sin, died on the cross on behalf of all of mankind.  This gift from God we did not ask for and one we certainly do not deserve but...

He is so rich in kindness and grace that he purchased our freedom with the blood of his Son and forgave our sins. (Eph 1:7)

It's very important to note that Jesus did not die just for the Jews, that He also died for the Gentiles.  In today's world, Gentiles would translate to include Christians, Muslims, atheists, Buddhists, Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses, etcetera, and you get the point.

Easter Sunday marks God's next gift to mankind when Jesus rose from the dead three days after His Crucifixion. The Risen Christ was witnessed and His appearance was recorded by many as proof...

After his suffering, he showed himself to these men and gave many convincing proofs that he was alive. He appeared to them over a period of forty days and spoke about the kingdom of God. (Acts 1:3)

Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.... (1 Peter 1:3)

The culmination of all of these gifts from God can be wrapped up (yes, that's a pun) with God's promise of salvation to all those who believe...

For God so loved the world, that he gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.(John 3:16-17)

Once again it's very important to note that God did not promise salvation only for the Jews - but for THE WORLD!  

And the angel said to them, "Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people.  For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.(Luke 2:10-11)

It's important to remember this because God's promise of salvation to the World is precisely what Christmas is all about, therefore...

Christmas is a holiday celebration for the entire World...  

Not just for Christians!

Jesus is God's Christmas gift to all that keeps on giving!

Merry Christmas to Everyone!

.



Turn Signals

Yes, turn signals, precisely those devices installed in automobiles with the specific purpose to be utilized by drivers to inform other drivers of your intention to change lanes or direction.  However, based upon my personal observation accumulated after decades of driving along the highways and byways, I've noticed that for some reason a high number of drivers opt not to use their turn signals.  Perhaps they do not know what that appendage protruding from the left side on the steering wheel column is there for, or maybe there is a deeper interpretation yet to be revealed.  Of course, you, my friendly reader, always signal your intention to turn, but it's the other readers that I'm not too sure about!

(Have you also questioned whether or not those new expensive luxury cars come equipped with turn signals?)

You see, signalling your intention to turn is not only a matter of obeying the law, it's also a matter of vehicle safety and common courtesy to the other drivers.  For example, California State Vehicle \ Code states that for safe driving practices ...

Always signal to other drivers, motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians when you plan to turn left, right, slow down, or stop. Signals may be given by hand-and-arm positions or by using the vehicle’s signal lights. If bright sunlight makes the signal lights hard to see, also use hand-and-arm signals.

Always signal—this lets other drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians know your plans.

Signal:

• When making a left or right turn, during the last 100 feet before reaching the turning point. Caution!—Even though you signal, do not automatically assume that the space you want to occupy is clear.
• Before every lane change check your mirrors, look over your shoulder, and check your blind spot before changing lanes.
• At least five seconds before you change lanes on a freeway.
• Before pulling next to the curb or away from the curb.
• When you change directions.
• Even when you do not see other vehicles. A vehicle you do not see may suddenly appear and hit you.

If you plan to turn beyond an intersection, start signaling when you are in the intersection. If you signal too early, the other driver may think you plan to turn into the intersection and he or she may pull out in front of you.  Remember to cancel your signal after turning. 

Be honest now, does the above describe what you typically observe during your daily commutes? 

I thought not!

(Other drivers can be very rude!  All I am trying to do is to drink my Starbuck's latte, eat a bagel, fix my hair, text my buddies, light a smoke, pluck my eyebrows, read the newspaper, shave my beard, surf on my blackberry, put on lipstick, pick my nose, put in my contacts, talk on my iPhone, or tie a Windsor knot..., and all they want to do is honk their horn at me!)

Visualize yourself stopped at a busy intersection waiting (patiently, of course) for the cross-traffic to pass so you can turn left and continue on your travels.  Suddenly Lady Luck appears to smile on you because there is shaping up an opportunity for you to make your move as soon as the vehicle coming from your left side passes by - just a moment more and you're ready to go - waiting for that one second chance to move out - but hey, what's happening?  That "one car" that is critical to your freedom appears to be slowing down, practically stopping right before you, and now it's turning right instead of driving by you!  %#@*!  Now you've lost that one-chance-in-a-million to get across the traffic - IF ONLY that driver signalled his intention to turn you could have been outta here!  Now you are stuck again and the traffic situation definitely is not improving nor is your attitude.  The birthing of road rage in real time!

(Have you noticed how often you are the first vehicle at a red light?  What are the odds?)

So what is my beef?  You see, even though state laws mandate turn signals be used for safety reasons, the issue to me is not whether one observes the laws but rather what is the attitude behind that decision.  You see, complimentary to vehicle safety are matters of courtesy, respect and consideration for the other drivers that are sharing the universe with you.  It's been said that a vehicle is just an extension of the personality behind the wheel and not much more can be truer than that observation. 
 

(Have you also noticed that drivers of large SUV's are the most inconsiderate of all drivers?  Of course not you in your SUV but certainly those others!  Well, that is another story for another time.)

So if a vehicle is an extension of a driver's personality, what does that say about drivers that exhibit road rage, excessive speeding, tail-gating, weaving in & out of traffic, running stop signs, failing to yield, or not using turn signals?  On a single instance, no big deal, but on a continuing basis any casual observer may deduct that these driving habits reflect a person that is self-centered, inconsiderate, and oblivious to others safety and well-being.  Does this describe you - of course not.

(Did you ever notice how many of the vehicles driven by the above personalities have a fish logo attached on the rear of their car?)

Now, you and I observe a strict adherence to the rules of the road, at least most of the time, which is why we enjoy clean driving records and low auto-insurance rates.  But what about our strict adherence to God’s Rules as we travel down the road of life?  How do we react when we hit bumps in the road or when we are forced to detour off of our path to success?  When we come to that proverbial cross road, do we follow the crowd or do we follow our conscious?  Are we the same person behind the wheel during a major traffic jam as we are when sitting in a church pew?  Are we speeding through life so fast that we fail to slow down to give a lift to those in need?  Do we consider others on the road as children of God or as obstacles to be maneuvered out of our way?  Do we realize what signals we send to those casual observers when we exit the road in an attempt to short-cut the journey that Jesus left for us to follow? 

 
(Do you know any current day Jeckle & Hydes - you know, the ones whose personality totally changes when they get behind the wheel of a car - what's that all about?)

Jesus commands us to love others as He has loved us (John 15:12).  I'm sure that message includes our actions behind the wheel of a car so let's share His love by sharing the road.  That slow car in front of you may be sent there by God to protect you from an accident or perhaps a speeding ticket.  And those red traffic lights that seem to know when you are coming to an intersection, well they provide us a great opportunity to pause and give thanks to God for His grace and mercy.  Let our journey be about others as much as it is about ourselves.  And pray for those that define road rage for their lives may need to find the peace that comes from knowing Jesus. 

(Do you agree that there ought to be a law forbidding seniors that have all day to get nowhere from driving during rush hours!)

Finally, pray for me because at times I too have my weak moments - just like you!



.