Sunday, May 29, 2011

Cult Mentality

Much attention has been generated around the world recently regarding Harold Camping's (Family Radio International) dire prediction that the rapture of Christians was to occur on May 21, 2011, thus leading to the end of the world six months later.  Of course, here we are looking back after Harold Camping's second prophesy failed to come true (in 1994 he predicted his first doomsday scenario).  In retrospect I guess we can now label Mr. Camping as a "false prophet" considering he is "O" for two!  Even though scripture clearly states that only God knows when the world, as we know it, will end (Matt 24:36), Harold Camping appeared convinced that he "broke the code" and it was just due to some minor miscalculations that his prophesy missed its mark.  Obviously, he was not being lead by the Holy Spirit else we would "all" now be in Heaven giving praise and glory to God our Father. You see, anyone can read what the Holy Bible says, but only the Holy Spirit can reveal to us what it means.  Needless to say, Harold Camping's interpretation of Holy Scripture was not led by the Holy Spirit.


However, some good may have resulted during the days leading up to May 21, 2011.  Both Christian and conventional secular media outlets of every technology type began discussing end-time theories, referencing the Holy Bible and openly debating Christian doctrine.  Some news commentators even dared orating God's name and - yes - the name of Jesus Christ too.  That alone is a miracle unto itself.  At work places, in malls and in other public places, God's Word was being bantered about, although mostly butchered and battered, but none the less, the world was paying attention to God for a brief moment.  Just imagine how many people who never gave God a second thought were now wondering if this end time prophesy "could be real"!  Hopefully Harold's prophesy, albeit unfulfilled, led many to seek Christ for the first time although I feel the verdict is still undecided if this event gave a boost or booted the lay perspective towards Christianity.


It's understandable, at least to me, how individuals can become obsessed with a theory, a philosophy, a belief, or a passion that blindly leads them down a path that conflicts with truths, realities, and known conventional wisdom.  Just focusing on Christianity alone, history is replete with movers and movements that defied rational thought yet marched headstrong along convinced within themselves that they were right and the "world" was wrong.  Some for the betterment of mankind while others not so beneficial.  For example, the Great Reformation, also known as the Protestant Reformation, was the European Christian reform movement led by Martin Luther, John Calvin, and other early Protestants, whom protested against the doctrines, rituals and ecclesiastical structure of the dominant Catholic Church, which led over time to the creation of the current day Protestant churches.  Many Christians today believe that the Reformation was worthy and righteous even though it appeared, at that time, to conflict with the present day religious tenets.  Worthy and righteous, that is, unless of course one was aligned with the Catholic Church. 


My focus here is not to discuss major theological movements hence I should start with a man named Jesus or perhaps even further back in history to Abraham with whom God established His Covenant and bloodline leading to man's redemption through the blood of the Son of God.  Rather, I'm curious about individual mindsets that proclaim to know God's truth, and who certainly have the truth of God's Word available to them via the Holy Bible, yet still manage to convince themselves to follow man's words instead of God's Word.  This phenomena I label "Cult Mentality" and the followers of  Harold Camping and his May 21, 2011 prophesy are the most current expose of this cult mentality.  However, we do not have to go back too far in American history to find other examples of famous cult mentalities - do you remember David Koresh and the Branch Davidians, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, or Marshall Applewhite and Heaven's Gate?  Now,  Harold Camping's movement was tame compared to the consequences met by the followers of the above movements, but none the less, each shared the common denominator that every cult member made a decision to follow man's words instead of God's Word. 


Perhaps here we should define the word "cult" as presented within, and to preserve space and typing tedium, I've selected a web site that, to me, sufficiently defines "cult" for our purposes.  I'll give you all the time you need to jump there, to peruse, and to return....




For clarification,  I am not broad-brushing Harold Camping's movement as a cult, far from it, nor is my purpose to debate the definition of a cult but perhaps rather to lightly examine / discuss how this cult mentality can dominate rational biblical thought and carry it to an extreme, or just to very subtle deviations from God's Word.


Whereas wise parents, teachers, and other counselors usually encourage young adults to challenge the status quo, to develop individual mindsets, to objectively compare other teachings, and to build independent thought upon an open exposure to all fields of learning, cult organizations tend to restrict, discourage, and prohibit its members from material not published or controlled by them.  Infiltrating and conquering cult mentality is certainly easier said than done.  To me, followers of the Mormon Church or Jehovah Witnesses are classic examples of cult mentalities that are extremely difficult to witness or evangelize to.  For this reason it's obvious why their church elders require them to travel in pairs when they come "knocking at your door".     

But when it comes to cult mentalities, we Christians are not fully insulated from the temptation of following man's words instead of God's Word.  To illustrate: If every Christian followed and obeyed God's Word, there would be but one body of believers following Christ instead of the hundreds of different denominations that exist today.  Organized religion has disorganized the Christian community and it's simply (actually quite complicated) because many Christians are also following man's words instead of God's Word.  Examples of a church's departure from God's Word is not always extreme as represented by the Mormon Church or by the Jehovah Witnesses, nor is always as subtle as Harold Camping's prophesies, but none the less, cult mentalities prevail throughout Christendom.

The subject is salvation:

We believe that we are all saved the same way, by the undeserved grace of the Lord Jesus." (Acts 15:11)

...that even though we were dead because of our sins, He gave us life when He raised Christ from the dead. (It is only by God's grace that you have been saved!) (NLT Eph 2:5);

God saved you by His grace when you believed. And you can't take credit for this; it is a gift from God. (NLT Eph 2:8).


There is no better illustration of God's love for us than believing that it is only through His Grace that we saved from from the penalty of sin and and that we are all promised eternal life through the death, burial and resurrection of His Son, Christ Jesus. It is through Faith in Christ Jesus that we are set free and not through any of our works or deeds of our own. That calls for an AMEN!

And yet, just look how many denominational, and some non-denominational churches, feel the need to add man into the equation of God's salvation.  Basically, for every different named denominational church, there is proposed something else that man must do (works) before one is even a candidate for salvation!  It's as if "we" feel a need to participate, to earn salvation, else we are surely lost for eternity.  It is precisely here where "cult mentality" permeates into the tenets of organized christian religion, where we follow mans words instead of God's Word!  Let's look at how this works:

While Christians avow that through faith in Jesus' death, burial and resurrection we are promised our own eternal resurrection - and there should be a period (.) here - many denominations add at least one other criteria to God's Word, such as:

Baptism by water;
Asking for forgiveness of sins;
Speaking in tongues;
Tithing;
Attending church on on a certain day of the week;
Church attendance;
Receiving Sacraments;
Membership in the "true" church;
Living a holy life;
Absolution of sins before (or after) death.

There are other criteria imposed, I'm sure, but you get the idea.  Maybe it's "human nature" that we feel the need to be in control to some level, or maybe it's the cult mentality wherein "we" don't even question church leaders as to why their tenets do not fully align with God's Word.  More important, why do followers continue to follow man's words over God's Word?  Satan certainly is playing a role here too!

So, before we Christians criticize or condemn Harold Camping or his devoted followers, perhaps some deep spiritual reflection is called for on our part; to pray that the Holy Spirit intervenes into our hearts to guide us through His discernment and perspective on where we are in relationship to God.  Remember God loves us all and that... God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life (John 3:16).

However, if you still believe that you must do something, somehow, in some manner, perhaps through works, to receive salvation other than through God's Grace, then you should think twice the next time you are offered a drink of Kool-Aid.



.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Interesting

The word interesting is an interesting word, especially when you analyze it for when it is used, and why.  Common definitions of the word (interesting) reveal...
  1. arousing curiosity or attention: arousing curiosity, attracting or holding attention, or provoking thought;
  2. not boring: enjoyable because of being varied, challenging, stimulating, or exciting.
...and when used as indicated above, the word interesting is adaptable and appropriate in context.  For example, intellectual justifications expressed to support one political candidate over other candidates could be described as interesting when compared to my rationale to promote a different candidate. (Emphasis  on "intellectual").  

However, the more "interesting" applications of this particular word are when we use the word to either mask our true opinion, so as not to offend, or to hide behind it, when not having an opinion at all.  Consider ones individual interpretation of "The Arts" as probably one of the more prevalent scenarios of when "interesting" does not really mean "interesting". 


Let's say, for example, when I find myself at an art gallery and I am exposed to various displays of, hmmm, Modern Abstract Art paintings.  You know the kind of indescribable objects and displays one encounters at a modern art show.  Let's be honest, do you actually understand or appreciate all that is presented before you as abstract art?  No offense to artist Mark Lawrence for my lack of culture or "proper breeding" but the only word in my vocabulary that would be an appropriate response to the solicitation "what do you think" on that which is before me would be "interesting" - as I spontaneously nod my head up and down as if in some really deep interpretive thought.  

Come on, admit it, you've been there and done that - right? 

Some poetry produce the same impact to my inner consciousness as involuntarily expressed by the external blank reaction on my face. 

To the New World


What eats through fibers, salt
And sting, our hands defeat.
We make our journey comforting—
Wood masts rot, or is it just
That planks reflect the gutter light
Of daybreak? Dawns we wake
To smoke of rusted galley stoves.
From buckets, swabbing hieroglyphs,
The story going on the wall.
Our prayer: Consume
My heart away. The seaman's
Cough, the first mate shrill.
Brass canteen, directory and quills
Coursing under foam, holds
Stocked with flour, rosaries.
We keep the books. We keep
And write it down, and look
For tell-tale signs.
An albatross. Whale whiteness
In the sky. The bleakness
Of our tarnished boat, the afterglows
Of beach. A voyage
We've been on so long.
But weren't we spoken to?
These rocking waves, vast winds.
No laws. Not here.
No laws, no hearth, no heart,
No dowry dress, we mean no harm.


Again, no offense to poet Valerie Duff for my lack of culture or "proper breeding" but the only word in my vocabulary that would be an appropriate response to the solicitation "what do you think" on that which is before me would be "interesting" - as I spontaneously nod my head up and down as if in some really deep interpretive thought.

How about many theoretical discussions on cosmic dark matter theories, such as an introduction to WIMPs:

"Short for Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, the ghostly WIMPs are predicted by theory but have so far eluded detection. With odd names like photino and masses of perhaps 10 to 100 times that of the proton, WIMPs could account for lots of dark matter if, as some theories predict, they are common in the universe. Cosmologists like cold-dark-matter WIMPs because they would be relatively heavy and thus move much slower than the speed of light. If so, they could have been the gravitational “seeds” around which regular matter congregated to form galaxies yet, because they don't interact with radiation, not affect the observed smoothness of the cosmic background radiation."

As before, no offense to professor Stephen Hawkins for my lack of culture or "proper breeding" but the only word in my vocabulary that would be an appropriate response to the solicitation "what do you think" on that which is before me would be "interesting" - as I spontaneously nod my head up and down as if in some really deep interpretive thought.

This is an interesting dilemma, is it not? 

Now, going forward, when others respond to my solicitation of "what do you think" about this Blog posting that is before them, I will have to decide if I have provoked thought within them or if they are masking their true opinion when they respond with "interesting" - as they spontaneously nod their heads up and down as if in some really deep interpretive thought.






Saturday, May 7, 2011

Judgement Day

Family Radio International, a Christian radio-based ministry, has been prophesying across the world that on May 21, 2011, God will render His Final Judgement and will "...destroy the world because of the sins of mankind."  How they determined the exact date to be May 21, 2011, can be read in their website:


You can read it and decide for yourself! My purpose here is not to debate their prophesy because soon enough time will reveal the truth.  For those of us now in the Body of Christ, we're always anticipating Christ's return as we try to live according to God's Will, so if Jesus is to return in a few weeks from this posting - Hallelujah !

Many of us have seen "End of the World" prophesies before along with many false prophets that claim to be the Christ or to have been given special dispensation from the Son of God.  Heck, this has been going on for over the past 2,000 years.  Even Holy Scripture warns us against false prophets.  

"Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world."   
1 John 4:1

And just for clarification, I am not accusing Family Radio International of false prophesy - how would I know?  But because they have resurrected the issue of Judgement Day, there are two scenarios that should be considered:

Scenario 1:  They, Family Radio International, are right - May 21, 2011, is God's Judgement Day? 

Scenario 2:  They are wrong? 

May 22, 2011, will reveal the truth. 

Seriously though, if May 21st is Judgement Day:

ARE YOU READY

 and if not

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?


Once again, and as always, the Bible shows us the way to salvation:

"Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved."
Romans 10:13:

For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God
Ephesians 2:8


You see, even if Family Radio is wrong about May 21, 2011, eventually you will die!  No one gets out of here alive!  If not on May 21st, then when?  No matter when or how we meet our demise, we will face our own individual Judgement Day, so the above questions are still pertinent - are you ready and if not, what are you doing about it? 

Something else to consider about this Judgement Day prophesy.  Repercussions!  That is, if we all wake up on May 22nd, what will those that are not followers of Christ now say about Christianity?  What about their expected accusations that the Holy Bible was and is wrong?  Even now many atheist groups are planning Judgement Day parties in direct opposition to the Family Radio's message, and although Family Radio has a fall-back position, it appears to me that the Body of Christ would have been better served if we just continued proclaiming God's Word without putting a "drop-dead" date on it.  Yes, I know that God is bigger than all of this and He can overcome any and all of our dilemmas, even if our intentions were good.  Thank You God!

So where do we go from here - both literally and figuratively?  Because God gave us "free will" we get to decide exactly where we go from here.  We just don't get to know or decide WHEN!



Hey, if we are still around after all of this, maybe we can talk about the Mayan calendar next - ha!